Talk:Nodebuilder
I suggest returning to nodebuilder
Reasons:
- I'm fairly sure it's the established and accepted convention.
- Someone who hugs trees is a treehugger, not a treeshugger.
- Nodebuilder wins the Googlefight by quite a... well, click the link.
If no-one objects within a few days, I'll do so. --Oogaland 14:08, 3 December 2007 (PST)
Doomworld uses "nodesbuilder", so whether this or the other is the more commonly used convention, I'm not sure. Nodesbuilder may actually be a slang or "misnomer" (for lack of better term) within the Doom community, in that sense. However, you do have a point in that "nodebuilder" is more grammatically correct (arguments can be made, but let's not.) I made a reference to both names in the article and moved it to "nodebuilder" for that term being grammatically correct. :) --Digiku talk 15:28, 3 December 2007 (PST)
I'm for it more because of the results of the googlefight than any technical DooM terms. (I mean, come on. How many users are that concerned over what the DooM community calls it? Besides, this isn't DooM.) If that many more people' are using "nodebuilder" over "nodesbuilder", I think we should accommodate that huge majority there. ~DarkWarrior Talk • Contribs 18:15, 3 December 2007 (PST)
And most people don't capitalize Doom as DooM. :P –SonicMaster 01:46, 4 December 2007 (PST)
I acknowledge my abnormality, and I don't care! :o ~DarkWarrior Talk • Contribs 06:41, 4 December 2007 (PST)
Not to mention the actual term "nodebuilder", in search results, actually refers to unrelated topics such as network nodes! OH!
Just kidding! :) --Digiku talk 09:31, 4 December 2007 (PST)
Treeshugger...that's so funny and therefore awesome! Let's, for humorous reasons, start using that occasionally! XD –SonicMaster 15:23, 7 December 2007 (PST)