User talk:Sonadow7
Why do you upload a sample for a linedef type that already exists? We only need one for every linedef type. --SpiritCrusherTalk • Contribs 08:20, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
I added it becase I wanted to show how different lenghts of lindefs on the control sectors can change the speed of the FOF(s). I added this WAD just in case they were confused about the constructions. I was confused at first, and it took me a long time to figure out how to change the speed. I just wanted to help, is that a bad thing? Byy the way, at the top of the page it says that it needs one or more sample WADs when there already is one, which I will take off the top after you respond. --Sonadow7 20:32, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
Nevermind, you deleted it...--Sonadow7 23:33, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
In case there is something else you want to show, please put it in the already existing example WAD and reupload it. Anyway, thanks for your input. --SpiritCrusherTalk • Contribs 04:52, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
Well, I am not entirely sure how I would present it. I am not a pro when it comes to editing pages. --Sonadow7 22:46, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
There is nothing to present, just reupload the file if you like to change something. Also, please use the naming convention shown here for new example WADs. This make the file names more consistent and less confusing both for maintainers and for users. Especially, naming a linedef type file with lindef is somewhat irritating. --SpiritCrusherTalk • Contribs 10:44, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
I apologize, I was thinking of something different. Yeah, I do need to change the name of a WAD I uploaded for lindef type 605. I just like to help the SRB2 community. --Sonadow7 14:36, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
Don't think we don't appreciate your effort, because we do. Also, you don't need to rename that file, I already renamed all files with unfitting file names. --SpiritCrusherTalk • Contribs 14:42, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
I saw that. Well, thank you. I'm going to try and contribute some more WADs. --Sonadow7 14:49, 29 April 2010 (UTC)